Whether you're the England manager or captain - remember them? - or involved in the game at grassroots level, football is never short of a talking point or two. And don't we just love it!
The last few weeks have been no exception with incidents and talking points aplenty. And as ever, we've asked what you think as we try to gauge the mood of the real football public.
Here are the results of some recent Club Website polls, where we find out what you think about the big issues from across the spectrum of the game.
Support for the FA's youth football revolution?
Last month the Football Association published their final proposals for the future of youth football in England, as brought to you here on Club Website.
Of course, we wanted to know what you thought of the proposals and, not surprisingly, the subject really got you going - again!
Significantly, 24.4% of you remain undecided, which means that there are still plenty of hearts and minds left for Nick Levett and his colleagues at the FA to try to win over before the proposals are put to the National Game Board and FA Council this spring.
Have you made your mind up? Or are you one of the undecided? Tell us what you think in our comments section below.
What constitutes a bad tackle?
One of the hot topics of recent weeks has been tackling and, more specifically, what constitutes a dangerous tackle.
The debate reached a height following Manchester City captain Vincent Kompany's red card for his tackle on Nani in the Manchester Derby (see below).
The tackle, which saw the player leave the ground before winning the ball with both feet but no contact on the player, really split opinion. So we wanted to find out what you guys and girls thought. Did Kompany's challenge warrant a red card?
57% of you felt a red card was unjustified. 30% thought that it warranted a yellow card at most, while 27% didn't even think it was a foul.
One in four of you (25%) understood the ref's decision but thought the game had "gone soft", while only 18% agreed that the challenge was worthy of a red card.
What do you think? Is it right that this type of challenge is clamped down on? Or do you think tackling a dying art? Have your say below!
A yellow card for an imaginary card?
Less dangerous than tackling, but just as annoying to many, is the brandishing of imaginary cards by players wanting to get opponents booked.
Man City boss Roberto Mancini accused Wayne Rooney of talking referee Chris Foy into the aforementioned red card for Vincent Kompany by waving an imaginary card. To stir the debate further, the Italian then found his own imaginary cards twice over in the following week, in a classic case of 'do as say, not as I do'.
Whilst not as prevalent in grassroots football as the professional game, invisible cards have been known to get brandished at parks and playing fields around the country, so we wanted to get your take on the matter.
We asked if the production of an imaginary card should be a punishable offence in itself.
A whopping three-quarters of our 3,000 respondents said yes, with 61% asking for a (non-imaginary) yellow card in return and 14% going so far as calling for a red card.
With only a quarter of you (25%) happy for this particular charade to go unpunished, we can sense a clamour for a change.
How can a referee punish a player for waving something that doesn't exist?
I mean, what if they claim to be waving an imaginary banana?
Join the debate!
We love our football chat here at Club Website and we know you do too. If you want to get involved, just add your comments to any article that gets you going here on our news pages. Thousands of CW administrators see the comments, so you can really stir the debate, either here or over at Facebook - both great places for a bit of ding dong!
And of course, if you have a question that you'd like to put to the Club Website masses, make sure you let us know. We read every suggestion and will use the best on our Club Website polls.
So why not let thousands of football fans solve that argument you're having with your team mate? Get involved today!